Curse

Ramus · Jun 13, 2005, 09:33 PM // 21:33

Jackson was acquitted on all charges, this is a sad day for the US court system. First OJ, now Jackson.

Tyil Thunder Arrow · Jun 13, 2005, 09:35 PM // 21:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramus

Jackson was acquitted on all charges, this is a sad day for the US court system. First OJ, now Jackson.

Now just cause your a freak don't mean you molest kids
Now OJ was guilty as hell

Prince Daniel · Jun 13, 2005, 09:38 PM // 21:38

Jackson was a sick man in need of help, he should have been charged with at least one of the charges or been given proffesional help. All is not right with him. Jurors were probably too scared to do otherwise

midnyte13 · Jun 13, 2005, 09:43 PM // 21:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prince Daniel

Jackson was a sick man in need of help, he should have been charged with at least one of the charges or been given proffesional help. All is not right with him. Jurors were probably too scared to do otherwise

too stupid more likely.....if anyone of us had been accused of anything close to what he's being charged with, we'd be doing life. Its all about the money. keep yer noses clean boyz and girlz....cuz somebody will pay for his injustices...let it not be any of us!

Ramus · Jun 13, 2005, 09:44 PM // 21:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prince Daniel

Jackson was a sick man in need of help, he should have been charged with at least one of the charges or been given proffesional help. All is not right with him. Jurors were probably too scared to do otherwise

Agreed, theres no way in hell those Jurors could have all found him non-guilty. I think there was some foul play.

Navaros · Jun 13, 2005, 09:51 PM // 21:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramus

Jackson was acquitted on all charges, this is a sad day for the US court system. First OJ, now Jackson.

there was zero credible evidence against Jackson in this trial

therefore he should have been found not guilty on that basis. to convict based on the illegitimate testimony of a flaky loon, compulsive liar of a con artist and her lil con artist kids; that would be a sad day for the US court system

that said, Jackson is of course guilty of doing freaky stuff with kids. they should have got some credibile witnesses to prove it.

ManadartheHealer · Jun 13, 2005, 10:30 PM // 22:30

Meh, he could have been either guilty or innocent. The point was it was not proven. The end.

Jackell · Jun 13, 2005, 10:36 PM // 22:36

See, or legal system is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The accuser tried to blackmail Jay Leno, and was a repateded welfare cheat.

The prosecution claimed a chef saw Micheal molest Macaulay Culkin, while Culkin himself said no, he didn't.

The prosecution was sloppy, and with the points above, I wasn't convinced beyond a reasonable doubt.

Many people are quick to decree him as guilty because, yes, he is a freak, and that scares us. And people love to tear down the idols. But, he wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, especially with the accusers mother having tried to blackmail Jay Leno on false charges.

Dreamsmith · Jun 13, 2005, 10:54 PM // 22:54

Um, yeah. I admit I didn't like follow the whole trial thing, but I don't recall ever hearing any credible evidence for a crime. For those of you convinced he was guilty, what did I miss? What was the actual evidence?

Regarding O.J., yes, he was probably guilty, but the prosecution presented a case with holes large enough to drive a white Ford Bronco through...

EchoSex · Jun 13, 2005, 10:56 PM // 22:56

In my own country-

More than 3 kids claim you touched them, your in jail.
You own a dog smaller than a roast beef, your kicked out.
You stab your wife, we stab you.
You cheat on your wife, we hire Rossie O'donnel to cheat WITH you. (Barf.)
You cheat on your husband, we hire Micheal More to cheat WITH you. (BARF.)

But unfortintly, this aint me country, and even though a confession to drug posesion was said, AND that several claimed to have been touched, that scumbag slipped away. You can get anything you want if you have money -.-

Mango Midget · Jun 13, 2005, 11:01 PM // 23:01

I wonder How much Jackson Paid the Judge/Jury?

Ramus · Jun 13, 2005, 11:52 PM // 23:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dreamsmith

Um, yeah. I admit I didn't like follow the whole trial thing, but I don't recall ever hearing any credible evidence for a crime. For those of you convinced he was guilty, what did I miss? What was the actual evidence?

Regarding O.J., yes, he was probably guilty, but the prosecution presented a case with holes large enough to drive a white Ford Bronco through...

There was plenty of evidence against him, not saying the prosecution did a good job, because they didn't. But the pornography with the finger prints, the staff members at his estate claiming that he ordered them to lock the family in, people who saw him serve them alcohol. (Why would these people risk there jobs to lie about him?)

How many children do you know go around accusing people of sexual molestation? Once, twice, three times???? Give me a break.

The whole trial was a zoo, hundreds of people outside. Another mockery of the court system just like the Peterson trial. In that case there was a lynch mob outside, and they got there way. In this case there were die hard crazy fans outside.

Inde · Jun 14, 2005, 12:02 AM // 00:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackell

See, or legal system is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The accuser tried to blackmail Jay Leno, and was a repateded welfare cheat.

The prosecution claimed a chef saw Micheal molest Macaulay Culkin, while Culkin himself said no, he didn't.

The prosecution was sloppy, and with the points above, I wasn't convinced beyond a reasonable doubt.

Many people are quick to decree him as guilty because, yes, he is a freak, and that scares us. And people love to tear down the idols. But, he wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt, especially with the accusers mother having tried to blackmail Jay Leno on false charges.

Concurred. Innocent before PROVEN guilty chaps.

PieXags · Jun 14, 2005, 12:25 AM // 00:25

Precisely. The reason he was found innocent of all charges is because there was no evidence to support the accusations that would cause them to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt people. They couldn't prove anything. It was just a bunch of "he said this, she says she saw this, he told me this" bullshit. And there was nowhere near enough proof given to make the jury think the was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The outcome was EXACTLY how it should have been, they couldn't prove him guilty, so he's innocent. Plain and simple.

Do I think Jackson's a pretty messed up guy? Yeah. Do I think he did some things he problably shouldn't have? Possibly. Do I think the accusers are blowing things out of proportion because they're a bunch of money grubbing smacktards? Yeah.

No proof. No punishment. Fair and square.

Lampshade · Jun 14, 2005, 12:37 AM // 00:37

http://ellesurlalune.hautetfort.com/...smiley.2.3.gif

I was not suprised.

Gaele · Jun 14, 2005, 12:41 AM // 00:41

Lordieloo I do hate the biased. My local radio station keeps updating on the case with statements of him and his Jesus Juice gag, that child who testifyed that he *was* given oral, and the rest is a blur cause they talk about that stuff while I'm still half asleep.
I don't doubt at all the possibility of him doing those things, nor do I question the possibility that not having an african american member in the jury changing the overall outcome, and I have the belief that the jury was also biased as well. But then who am I to have any say that counts with the issue, it's just another messed up day following many others and following even more.

DarrenJasper · Jun 14, 2005, 05:21 AM // 05:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramus

Agreed, theres no way in hell those Jurors could have all found him non-guilty. I think there was some foul play.

You are the sad but hilarious product of our country's psychotic media.

Traps · Jun 14, 2005, 05:23 AM // 05:23

Reqular person---Guilty

cleb(MJ)----not Guilty

enough said

Gear853 · Jun 14, 2005, 07:39 AM // 07:39

I got a feeling, Jacko paid alot of money to be not Guilty...

anyone got the same thing?

Omega_2005 · Jun 14, 2005, 07:43 AM // 07:43

IMHO he should have been not guilty, but without the help of his fans outside, if they DID prove him guilty, the wrath from the fans would be catastrophic, as they could find the offenders and... possibly kill them *sighs*

However, if it's over, that's all I currently care about. Move along, and think of a better thing to do... PLAY GUILD WARS!